Kiersten Essenpreis for BIIn 2021, when I joined Business Insider as a workplace reporter, I noticed something strange about my new readers: They were obsessed with the Financial Independence, Retire Early movement. Week after week, I watched them flock to stories about people who stopped working in their 30s and 40s.Having spent much of the 2010s in San Francisco, I had occasionally heard about high-earning tech workers sharing tiny studios with multiple roommates and subsisting on instant ramen so they could retire young. I never understood why they were killing themselves just to escape what seemed like perfectly good jobs. FIRE, as I understood it, was a fringe movement — just one of many eccentricities in a city full of people devoted to odd things.So why, as the economy was emerging from the depths of the pandemic, were all these articles about FIRE suddenly going viral? The mystery nagged at me but I just couldn't take it seriously. From the extreme austerity the movement espoused to the passive-income side hustles that sounded kind of scammy, everything about it seemed unrealistic. I assumed FIRE would flame out.Five years later, I couldn't have been more wrong. The movement has only grown more popular: The main subreddit now has 2.4 million followers. Half of millennials list financial independence as a life goal of theirs. And Business Insider has even assigned a reporter to cover the movement, my colleague Kathleen Elkins. No one has helped me understand why more than Laura Sonday, a professor of organizational behavior at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a leading researcher on the movement.For her doctoral dissertation, Laura Sonday spent years conducting in-depth interviews with 55 devotees.Jeremy M. Lange for BIFor her doctoral dissertation, Sonday spent years observing FIRE meetups and retreats and conducting in-depth interviews with 55 devotees, some of whom had achieved financial independence and some of whom were still working toward it. When I first stumbled on her findings in 2024, I began to see the movement in a different light — as a deeply philosophical response to the broken state of modern work. She's since built on that research for a new paper that was just published in one of the top management journals, Administrative Science Quarterly.At its core, Sonday argues, FIRE is a rejection of the dominant way we view work in American culture: that good workers demonstrate an unwavering dedication to our jobs. Sociologists have given this belief a variety of names — the ideal worker norm, the work-devotion schema — but most of us know it more colloquially as hustle culture. The standard emerged in the postwar boom of white-collar jobs, back when the vast majority of corporate professionals were men with stay-at-home wives and companies promised their employees lifelong job security. But over the decades, the economy changed: Women flooded into the workforce and layoffs became the norm. In this new world, it became harder for workers to give so much of their lives to their jobs — and that kind of loyalty also no longer came with the guarantee of a stable career or a pension. So what's a modern worker to do? FIRE answers that dilemma by offering a whole new way of thinking about work.That new ideal centers around the idea that work should be optional. It's not that work is bad per se, FIRE followers told Sonday — it's that having to work is bad. To them, financial independence — the movement's lingo for saving up enough money to never need to work again — was about freeing you to live the life you actually want. For some, that meant escaping work entirely as an early retiree. But a surprising share of the people Sonday interviewed intended to keep working. Many saved up so they could switch into an occupation that was less lucrative but more fulfilling, or work a more flexible schedule that would allow them to take a random Tuesday off for a beach outing with their kids."Am I just studying a really privileged group of people," Sonday wondered, "or is this actually a means to economic mobility?"Jeremy M. Lange for BIThe most telling anecdotes came from the people who reached their savings goals and not only kept working, but chose to keep doing the same jobs. One guy Sonday spoke to kept a letter of resignation at the ready, a reminder to himself that he had the freedom to leave his job if his company did something he morally objected to. He eventually presented it when his employer pressured him to lay off his employees. Another person said achieving financial security gave her the confidence she needed to disagree with her boss. From the outside, it may have looked like financial independence changed very little about their lives — they were still in the same jobs — but to them their freedom meant everything. It changed their relationship with work itself. No longer dependent on their paychecks, they didn't have to compromise themselves anymore for the sake of keepin
Don't miss out on breaking stories and in-depth articles.
