The electorate has expanded. But has the balance of power really changed? By Paul Lucky Okoku Before Nigerians debate who should become the next President of the Nigeria Football Federation, perhaps we should first ask a more fundamental question: Who actually chooses the NFF President? Not who has the biggest name. Not who played football. Not who presents the best programme. Not even who may be the most qualified. Who has the votes? For years, the answer could be found in a remarkable piece of electoral mathematics. Under the previous NFF structure, the 36 State Football Associations and the Federal Capital Territory controlled 37 of the 44 votes in the NFF Congress. That was 84.1 percent of the entire electorate. Think about what that means. One constituency within the Nigerian football family possessed more than four out of every five votes used to determine the leadership of the national game. The structure operated under the NFF’s 2010 Statutes and became the subject of sustained criticism from stakeholders who argued that representation within the Congress was too heavily concentrated. At the 2018 NFF election, for example, the electorate consisted of the 37 State FA/FCT representatives alongside representatives of the referees, players, coaches and the four national leagues — 44 voters altogether. So although Nigerian football contains many different interests, one group accounted for 37 of those 44 votes. That deserves examination. WHAT DOES 84.1% REALLY MEAN? Put football aside for a moment. Imagine a hypothetical Nigerian presidential election. Nigeria contains teachers, doctors, lawyers, farmers, traders, engineers, civil servants, business owners, artisans and people from countless other professions. Now imagine that the electoral system gave one occupational group — let us use teachers purely as an illustration — 84.1 percent of the voting power. Everyone else could participate. Everyone else could campaign. Everyone else could express an opinion. But the teachers’ bloc, acting together, would possess enough votes to choose the President without needing the support of everybody else. Would we consider that a broadly balanced electorate? That is not a comparison between the constitutional election of a Nigerian President and an NFF election. They are obviously different institutions. It is simply an illustration of what 84.1 percent concentration of voting power looks like when translated into everyday democratic language. WHY DOES CONCENTRATED VOTING POWER MATTER? Concentrated voting power does not, by itself, prove corruption. That distinction is essential. The concern is about institutional design and vulnerability to influence. If candidates know that one relatively small constituency possesses enough votes to determine an election, political attention will naturally concentrate on that constituency. Relationships with those voters become particularly valuable. Their support becomes particularly valuable. Their collective position becomes particularly powerful. That does not mean anyone has done anything improper. It means a well-designed electoral system should consider whether too much power has been concentrated in too few hands. History gives Nigerians a reason to examine that question carefully. Ahead of the 2010 FIFA World Cup in South Africa and the football elections that followed, contemporary Nigerian newspaper reports raised concerns about State FA chairmen travelling to major tournaments and about the possible electoral implications of those relationships. Those were allegations and concerns raised at the time; they should not now be converted into established facts of vote-buying. The more important governance question survives regardless: Should an electoral system be designed in a way that makes the support of one constituency overwhelmingly decisive? Good governance should protect the institution, the candidates and the voters themselves from situations capable of creating reasonable questions about influence. THEN CAME MARCH 2026 On March 23, 2026, at an Extraordinary General Assembly in Yenagoa, Bayelsa State, the NFF unanimously approved amendments to its Statutes, Electoral Code and Standing Orders. That reform deserves recognition. The new framework broadened participation considerably. The NFF Congress now comprises 108 delegates exercising 54 votes, bringing additional representation from clubs, leagues, women’s football, player
Don't miss out on breaking stories and in-depth articles.
